Protectionism

Written By: 
dbv

The National Post of September 20th 2011 headline read: Harper: Part of U.S. jobs bill ‘protectionist,’ ‘regrettable’ in reference to the Buy America policy in the U.S. government jobs bill.  This bill is intended to spur the job market in the United States by funding  infrastructure and public works projects - all subject to Buy America stipulations. Harper indicated that "the Canadian government will be taking up with its U.S. counterpart “at the highest levels.”Protectionism

Like his Conservative counterpart before him (Mulroney in the 1980's) , Harper has not been able to make inroads into the Buy America policy outlined originally in 2010. The Canadian Center For Policy Alternatives report of March 2010 indicated that in the agreement which Harper's government negotiated  "Canada opens up access to public purchasing in all provinces. Where the Buy American exemption is time-limited, Canada’s offer is mostly permanent. Our provincial and municipal procurement is worth tens of billions of dollars every year – and this is the first time these immense purchases will be subject to the provisions of international trade law. Worse yet, we’re doing this right when many struggling Canadian manufacturers (from public transit to pharmaceuticals to windmills) could benefit mightily from the strategic leveraging of a home-field advantage."

Resisting Protecionism, Promoting Free Trade   International Trade Minister Peter Van Loan tells American Chamber of Commerce in Canada focus on economy is key to recovery June 22, 2010  "“Canada believes that lasting economic recovery—not just in North America, but around the world—depends on free trade, not protectionism,” said Minister Van Loan."

From the Government of Canada website:

Backgrounder – Buy American

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) requires that all iron, steel and manufactured goods used in the construction, maintenance or repair of a public building or public work funded by the Act is produced in the United States. These provisions were more restrictive than before as they expanded the scope of projects subject to the requirements; pre-existing Buy American requirements only applied to transit-related procurement. Canada raised its concerns on these expanded Buy American provisions at all levels.

While Canada and the United States have procurement obligations in relation to each other at the federal level, no such obligations existed at the state, provincial or local level. As a result, Buy American provisions in the Recovery Act blocked Canadian access to U.S. state and local procurement markets, some of which were relatively open to Canadian suppliers for years—even in the absence of formal trade commitments. Furthermore, these new restrictions had an impact on the integrated supply chains developed between our two countries, negatively affecting businesses on both sides of the border.

The initial Canadian proposal to address this issue was developed with the provinces and territories and delivered to the United States on August 20, 2009. Negotiations and technical discussions continued until February 3, 2010, when lead negotiators concluded an agreement-in-principle pending final approval processes in both countries.

Canada and the United States signed the Agreement on February 12, 2010. On the same date, Canada and the U.S. each provided a notification to the World Trade Organization to give effect to the Canada-US Agreement on Government Procurement.

The Agreement

Canadian companies have the ability to participate in a number of infrastructure projects funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Under the provisions of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), Canada and the United States have agreed to offer each other permanent market access at the sub-federal level. This means that Canadian suppliers have guaranteed access to U.S. sub-federal procurement and U.S. suppliers have guaranteed access to provincial procurement in accordance with undertakings under the GPA.

In addition, the deal provides Canadian companies with preferential market access in a number of programs that are not accessible to other nations, such as certain programs of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Both countries have agreed to establish a fast-track consultation process should similar Buy American provisions apply to future funding programs in the United States. In the coming months, they will also initiate discussions to explore widening the scope of our mutual market access obligations, through a permanent, reciprocal procurement agreement that goes beyond the existing GPA.

This agreement sets an important precedent. The Government of Canada recognizes the deeply connected nature of our economies and the agreement speaks to the need to work together to encourage economic prosperity on both sides of the border.

Next Steps

To ensure Canadian companies benefit as much as possible from this agreement, Canada’s embassy and consulates throughout the United States are informing local governments and companies in the contracting and distribution businesses that Canadian companies are now eligible to bid on contracts covered by this agreement.


Canada-US Agreement on Buy American Feb. 16, 2010


The September 2011 Conference Board of Canada produced a report entitled Treading Water: Canada is Gradually Losing its Competitive Edge. 

 


Books in Western Libraries

Peddling protectionism Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression [electronic resource] : Douglas A. Irwin.

Skating on thin ice Canadian-American relations in 2010 and 2011 [electronic resource] : by Alexander Moens.

The G20 and green protectionism will we pay the price at Copenhagen? [electronic resource] : Simon J. Evenett and John Whalley.

A wave of protectionism? an analysis of economic and political considerations [electronic resource] : by Philipp Maier.

A workplan for Canada in the new global economy responding to the rise of Russia, India and China [electronic resource] : Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade.

Company law and economic protectionism edited by Ulf Bernitz and Wolf-Georg Ringe.

Money, markets, and sovereignty Benn Steil and Manuel Hinds.

Free trade under fire Douglas A. Irwin. :

Rethinking the global trading system : the next frontier author, Grant D. Aldonas.


Articles 

 Protectionism and Global Recession: Has the Link Been Broken?
Viju, Crina; Kerr, William A. Journal of World Trade45. 3 (Jun 2011): 605-628.

Winds of Trade Face Storm
Barley, Richard. Wall Street Journal [New York, N.Y] 01 Apr 2011: C.18.

INTERNATIONAL: Protectionism could become 'sticky'
Oxford Analytica Daily Brief Service
. (Jan 26, 2011).

PEDDLING PROTECTIONISM: SMOOT-HAWLEY AND THE GREAT DEPRESSION
Irwin, Douglas A. 2011.

Evolution of protectionism in the UK and the United States
Kuznetsov, A. International affairs [Moscow]57. 1 (2011): 132-142.

Do strong fences make strong neighbors?
Desai, Mihir A; Dharmapala, Dhammika. National tax journal63. 4 (Dec 2010): 723-740.

The Perils of Protectionism
Liebreich, Michael. Business Week (Oct 11, 2010): 1.

INTERNATIONAL: 'Hidden' protectionism circumvents WTO
Oxford Analytica Daily Brief Service
. (Aug 24, 2010).

The Fiction of Protectionism
Bin, Yao. Beijing Review53. 30 (Jul 29, 2010): 2.

How 'Protectionist' Became An Insult
Irwin, Douglas A. Wall Street Journal [New York, N.Y] 18 June 2010: .15.

THE RISKS OF RISING PROTECTIONISM
Bilas, Vlatka; Franc, Sanja. An Enterprise Odyssey. International Conference Proceedings: 30-40,2,5. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business. (May 26-May 29, 2010)

Intra-industry trade and protectionism: the case ofthebuy national policy
Kim, Dong-Hun. Public Choice143. 1-2 (Apr 2010): 49-65.

Canada-US relations in 2010
Moens, Alexander. Fraser Forum (Mar 2010): 14-19,4.

Deal reached between Canada and the U.S. on Buy American, sources say
Goodman, Lee-Anne. The Canadian Press [Toronto] 04 Feb 2010.

Are Standards Always Protectionist?
Marette, Stéphan; Beghin, John. Review of International Economics18. 1 (Feb 2010): 179-192.

Economic nationalism: Transatlantic responses to the financial crisis in comparative perspective
Diss.Workman, Garrett. 2010. ProQuest, Ann Arbor MI, 2010


What Does Protectionism Mean?
Government actions and policies that restrict or restrain international trade, often done with the intent of protecting local businesses and jobs from foreign competition. Typical methods of protectionism are import tariffs, quotas, subsidies or tax cuts to local businesses and direct state intervention. Investopedia





 

 

Comment on this News Story