Review of "Predatory" Open Access Publishers

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Jeffrey Beall has written a review on nine "predatory" open access scholarly publishers in the Charleston Advisor. From the critical evaluation section of the review:

These publishers are predatory because their mission is not to promote, preserve, and make available scholarship; instead, their mission is to exploit the author-pays, Open-Access model for their own profit. They work by spamming scholarly e-mail lists, with calls for papers and invitations to serve on nominal editorial boards. If you subscribe to any professional e-mail lists, you likely have received some of these solicitations. Also, these publishers typically provide little or no peer-review. In fact, in most cases, their peer review process is a fac╠žade. None of these publishers mentions digital preservation. Indeed, any of these publishers could disappear at a moment's notice, resulting in the loss of its content...

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:

Leave a comment